MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

S1351 Clinical Outcomes of Adult Patients With Short Bowel Syndrome Treated With Teduglutide: A 2-year Cohort Study From the Canadian Home Parenteral Nutrition Registry

2021· article· en· W3208304469 on OpenAlexaffabout
Dane Christina Daoud, Katherine J. P. Schwenger, Brian Jurevics, Scott Whittaker, Barbara Bielawska, David Armstrong, Donald R. Duerksen, Maitreyi Raman, James D. McHattie, Leah Gramlich, Johane P. Allard

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaMcMaster UniversityUniversity of ManitobaOttawa HospitalSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of ReginaUniversity of CalgaryCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineShort bowel syndromeParenteral nutritionInternal medicineQuality of life (healthcare)CohortMedical prescriptionClinical trialRetrospective cohort studyPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Clinical trials have shown that teduglutide, a synthetic GLP-2 analog, reduces the need for parenteral support (PS) in adult patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS). The objective of this study was to assess, in routine clinical practice, the outcomes of SBS patients on PS enrolled in the Canadian home parenteral nutrition (HPN) registry. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data extracted from the password protected, internet-based Canadian HPN registry. Adult SBS patients from 9 HPN programs, treated with teduglutide between January 2015 and 2021, were included. Data was collected every 6 months for 2 years and included demographics, anthropometrics, PS prescriptions, laboratories, hospitalizations, and quality of life based on the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). Response was defined as a daily PS volume reduction of ≥ 20% from baseline. Data was compared using Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. Results: 32 patients [(19 (59%) women; age 57.6 ± 12.8 years)] were included, representing about 50% of patients receiving teduglutide in Canada. The main cause of SBS was Crohn’s disease (n = 15, 47%); length of remaining small bowel was 79.5 ± 58.6 cm, and 14 patients (44%) had a colon in continuity. Over the study duration, 69% (n = 23) were responders and 28% (n = 9) achieved PS independency. Response at 18 months was associated with a longer PS duration before starting teduglutide (P = 0.01), the absence of narcotics (P = 0.01), a high oral intake (P = 0.04), and Crohn’s disease (P = 0.01). Patients who had been weaned had a longer PS duration (P = 0.01), lower weekly infusion days at baseline (P = 0.02) and lack of narcotics (0.01). Creatinine and electrolyte levels remained within normal limits in all patients. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels were significantly lower in weaned patients compared to non-weaned after 6 (P = 0.03) and 18 months (P = 0.01) of treatment. BMI, KPS and number of hospitalizations per year at baseline were comparable between responders and non-responders and remained comparable over the 2-year period. No severe adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Teduglutide was effective in reducing or weaning PS in SBS adult patients similarly to clinical trials. Overall, there were no changes in laboratory results except for an improvement in ALP in weaned subjects. Hospitalization rate, KPS and BMI did not change with PS reductions and teduglutide was well tolerated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score0.808

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology→French-language works237,207→