Structure and dynamics of a laminar separation bubble near a wingtip
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The three-dimensional flow topology of a laminar separation bubble forming on the suction surface of a semispan wing with an aspect ratio of $2.5$ and NACA 0018 airfoil section is characterised experimentally using surface pressure measurements and particle image velocimetry at a chord Reynolds number of $125\ 000$ . In the inboard region of the wing, the separation bubble is essentially two-dimensional, and the transition process in the separated shear layer leads to periodic vortex shedding, which dominates the bubble dynamics, similar to two-dimensional separation bubbles. However, progressive spanwise changes in the mean structure and vortex dynamics occur near the wingtip, leading to an open separation and eventual suppression of the bubble. In the immediate proximity of the wingtip, the boundary layer remains attached, no vortex shedding occurs and the flow remains laminar, terminating separation bubble formation. Despite variations in the mean separation bubble topology and vortex dynamics along the span, the fundamental shedding characteristics remain nearly invariant across the portion of the wing where vortex shedding occurs, and the flow appears to lock onto a common instability mode across the span, leading to minimal changes in the mean bubble characteristics despite notable changes in the effective angle of attack along the span. A comparison with available surface flow visualisations from previous studies indicates that the observed changes to the mean bubble footprint along the span of the wing are similar across different geometries and flow characteristics, suggesting similarities in the three-dimensional bubble topology and dynamics on finite wings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".