MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208380694 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4030893

How much is sole-cropping systems sustainable for camellia and crambe?

2019· article· en· W3208380694 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Federica Zanetti, Alessandra Vecchi, E. Alexopoulou, M. Christou, A. Borghesi, Terry A. Isbell, Andrea Monti

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAfrican Botany and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsCrambeCroppingCamelliaAgroforestryAgronomyBiologyEnvironmental scienceAgricultural engineeringBotanyEngineeringAgricultureEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crambe (Crambe abyssinica R.E. Fries) and camelina (Camelina sativa L. Crantz) are two oilseed crops belonging to the Brassicaceae family. Typically crops belonging to this family highly suffer from solecropping system, as extensively reported for oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. var. oleifera). Otherwise crambe and camelina are considered resilient species as demonstrated in the framework of the COSMOS (G.A. 635405) project, while in the MAGIC project (G.A. 727698) they have been identified also as suitable to grow in marginal land. But for a stable introduction of these two new oilseeds into typical European crop rotation schemes a full understanding of the effects of sole-cropping have never been carried out before. At this scope a multi-location and multi-year trial has been established in Italy (Bologna, 44°33’N, 11°23’E) and Greece (Aliartos, 8°22’N, 23°6’E) in 2017 and it is still ongoing, comparing the effect of sole-cropping vs. wheat-oilseed succession on one commercial variety of camelina (Midas, Linnaeus Plant Science, Canada) and on one of crambe (Galactica, Wageningen University and Research, The Netherlands). Since establishment in spring 2017, each year the oilseed is sown either on the past year stand or in a new stand in which winter wheat was grown the season before. The experimental design is a randomized complete block with 4 replicates. From the analysis of the first 2-year data surveyed at Bologna an interesting “species x cropping system” interaction effect emerged for seed yield, with camelina significantly suffering from mono-succession (-17%) while in crambe an increase on yield was surveyed (+10%). For all the other<br> analyzed seed quality parameters (i.e., seed weight, oil and protein contents, fatty acid composition) negligible effects due to cropping system were surveyed in both species. The inclusion of the data obtained in Greece together with a further year of trials (2019) will permit to more clearly quantify the effect of solecropping systems in these two emerging oilseed crops, with outstanding potential for the European biobased industry. From these preliminary results crambe seemed more suitable to sole-cropping system than camelina.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.240
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAfrican Botany and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207