MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208380864 · doi:10.46421/sibragec.v11i00.33

Sistema Last Planner X Advanced Work Packaging

2021· article· en· W3208380864 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eduarda da Silva Scott Hood, Eduardo Luís Isatto, Carlos Torres Formoso

Bibliographic record

VenueSimpósio Brasileiro de Gestão e Economia da Construção/Anais do ... Simpósio Brasileiro de Gestão e Economia da Construção · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlannerWork (physics)General partnershipConsolidation (business)Engineering managementProcess managementProcess (computing)Computer scienceField (mathematics)Work systemsWork in processKnowledge managementEngineeringConstruction engineeringArchitectural engineeringOperations researchBusinessOperations managementArtificial intelligenceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The implementation process of any management system generally faces several obstacles related to organizational changes and the nature of construction work and its requirements (HAMDI, 2013). This document will present two of the existing planning methods. Firstly, the Last Planner System (LPS), which comes from a vast period of studies and consolidation in the field of civil construction, and then an emerging method developed in 2011 by a research team in partnership with Construction Industry Institute (CII) and the Construction Owners Association of Alberta (COAA), entitled Advanced Work Packaging (AWP), focused on megaprojects. Finally, the purpose of this article is to present the two methods, their application and promote a brief discussion about their particularities and complementarities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSimpósio Brasileiro de Gestão e Economia da Construção/Anais do ... Simpósio Brasileiro de Gestão e Economia da ConstruçãoSame topicBIM and Construction IntegrationFrench-language works237,207