MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208405458 · doi:10.12998/wjcc.v9.i31.9571

Acute esophageal necrosis as a complication of diabetic ketoacidosis: A case report

2021· article· en· W3208405458 on OpenAlexaff
Kasey Moss, Tahrin Mahmood, Robert Spaziani

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Clinical Cases · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPotassium and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiabetic ketoacidosisComplicationGastroenterologyInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusEpigastric painSurgeryInsulinVomitingEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Acute esophageal necrosis (AEN) is a rare condition that has been associated with low volume states, microvascular disease, gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal damage, and impaired GI motility. It has been linked in case reports with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and is commonly associated with GI bleeding (GIB). CASE SUMMARY: We report a case of endoscopy confirmed AEN as a complication of DKA in a 63-year-old Caucasian male without any overt GIB and a chief complaint of epigastric pain. Interestingly, there was no apparent trigger for DKA other than a newly started ketogenic diet two days prior to symptom onset. A possible potentiating factor for AEN beyond DKA is the recent start of a Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), though they have not been previously connected to DKA or AEN. The patient was subsequently treated with high dose proton pump inhibitors, GLP-1 RA was discontinued, and an insulin regimen was instituted. The patient's symptoms improved over the course of several weeks following discharge and repeat endoscopy showed well healing esophageal mucosa. CONCLUSION: This report highlights AEN in the absence of overt GIB, emphasizing the importance of early consideration of EGD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0070.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of Clinical CasesSame topicPotassium and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207