VidAF: A Motion-Robust Model for Atrial Fibrillation Screening From Facial Videos
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, but an estimated 30% of patients with AF are unaware of their conditions. The purpose of this work is to design a model for AF screening from facial videos, with a focus on addressing typical motion disturbances in our real life, such as head movements and expression changes. This model detects a pulse signal from the skin color changes in a facial video by a convolution neural network, incorporating a phase-driven attention mechanism to suppress motion signals in the space domain. It then encodes the pulse signal into discriminative features for AF classification by a coding neural network, using a de-noise coding strategy to improve the robustness of the features to motion signals in the time domain. The proposed model was tested on a dataset containing 1200 samples of 100 AF patients and 100 non-AF subjects. Experimental results demonstrated that VidAF had significant robustness to facial motions, predicting clean pulse signals with the mean absolute error of inter-pulse intervals less than 100 milliseconds. Besides, the model achieved promising performance in AF identification, showing an accuracy of more than 90% in multiple challenging scenarios. VidAF provides a more convenient and cost-effective approach for opportunistic AF screening in the community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it