Youth movements, youth in movements: cycles overlap and discontinuities after the February 20th movement in Morocco
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article considers changes in Morocco’s contentious politics, where the 2011 Arab uprisings have not broken mobilizations from their routinized course. We consider that all the characteristics of the 20th February Movement (M20F) – the Moroccan equivalent of the 2011 Arab uprisings – should not be reduced to the 2010–2011 protest cycle. Similarly, all mobilizations since 2011 should not be regarded as spin-off movements of M20F. We propose to multiply levels of observation by tracking youth movements over time and regions to dissipate the unifying effect of the notion of a protest cycle. Since the 2000s, coordinating committees opposing price hikes and deterioration of public services have emerged. These protests centred on socio-economic issues have continued in the ‘popular movement of Al Hoceïma’ (October 2016–July 2017). Occurring after 2011, these protests are understandable as soon as one inscribes them in a different stream of mobilization of the peripheries on socio-economic issues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it