Whole Genome DNA Methylation Variations in Mammary Gland Tissues from Holstein Cattle Producing Milk with Various Fat and Protein Contents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Milk fat and protein contents are among key elements of milk quality, and they are attracting more attention in response to consumers′ demand for high-quality dairy products. To investigate the potential regulatory roles of DNA methylation underlying milk component yield, whole genome bisulfite sequencing was employed to profile the global DNA methylation patterns of mammary gland tissues from 17 Canada Holstein cows with various milk fat and protein contents. A total of 706, 2420 and 1645 differentially methylated CpG sites (DMCs) were found between high vs. low milk fat (HMF vs. LMF), high vs. low milk protein (HMP vs. LMP), and high vs. low milk fat and protein (HMFP vs. LMFP) groups, respectively (q value < 0.1). Twenty-seven, 56 and 67 genes harboring DMCs in gene regions (denoted DMC genes) were identified for HMF vs. LMF, HMP vs. LMP and HMFP vs. LMFP, respectively. DMC genes from HMP vs. LMP and HMFP vs. LMFP comparisons were significantly overrepresented in GO terms related to aerobic electron transport chain and/or mitochondrial ATP (adenosine triphosphate) synthesis coupled electron transport. A total of 83 (HMF vs. LMF), 708 (HMP vs. LMP) and 408 (HMFP vs. LMFP) DMCs were co-located with 87, 147 and 158 quantitative trait loci (QTL) for milk component and yield traits, respectively. In conclusion, the identified methylation changes are potentially involved in the regulation of milk fat and protein yields, as well as the variation in reported co-located QTLs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".