MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208723986 · doi:10.1016/j.ijans.2021.100377

The drive process model of entrepreneurship: A grounded theory of nurses’ perception of entrepreneurship in nursing

2021· article· en· W3208723986 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education and Employability
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipGrounded theoryThematic analysisNursingPsychologyCreativityExploitQualitative researchSociologyPublic relationsMedicineBusinessSocial psychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Entrepreneurship is a concept involving developing and managing a business venture in order to gain profit by taking several risks in the cooperate world. Nurses enjoy the privilege as the singular group of professionals with the most far-reaching presence at all levels of the health care system. However, the nurse is yet to exploit the opportunity created by the lack in the health system. Nurses need to get the necessary drive to exploit the entrepreneurship opportunities available to them. The purpose of this study is to explore the perception of entrepreneurship among nurses and develop a mid-range theory that explains the meaning and practices of entrepreneurship among nurses. The constructivist grounded theory design was used. In-depth Interview was conducted on 20 purposively selected participants using the zig-zag method of data collection until data saturation. Open to axial coding paradigm was used for thematic analysis by the researchers and co-coders. Finding was returned to participants and literature for verification. Findings were captured in six themes (a). Nursing entrepreneurship is creating innovation in nursing driven by education and expertise, passion for creativity and positive creative climate (b) : Nursing entrepreneurship is philanthropy in nursing through innovation creation motivated by passion for caring, need for recognition and the desire to leave a legacy, (c) Nursing entrepreneurship is innovation creation in nursing driven by professionalizing in Nursing motivated by specialized training and retraining, practicing with autonomy, research and ethical code, (d) Nursing entrepreneurship is creating innovation in nursing for social gratification driven by the need for leadership, financial independence, status enhancement and time flexibility, (e) Nursing entrepreneurship is innovation creation to fulfill the need for business savvy driven by opportunity identification, health risk management and health marketing, (f) Nursing entrepreneurship is innovation creation in nursing for socio economic transformation driven by the desire for job creation and wealth generation. Drive for innovation creation emerged as the core category and based on the relationship with other themes, the drive process model of entrepreneurship in nursing is proposed. Nursing entrepreneurship is perceived as innovation creation in nursing driven by the need for professionalism, philanthropy, social gratification, business savvy, and economic transformation, for optimal positive impact and better client outcomes. Utilizing this model will lead to positive transformations in health care practice, and engineer a positive future for the nursing profession, and the health care system globally especially in sub-Saharan Africa where the health care indices is alarming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.796

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it