MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208757195 · doi:10.1029/2021jc017176

Interannual Variability of Surface Salinity and Ekman Pumping in the Canada Basin During Summertime of 2003–2017

2021· article· en· W3208757195 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jihai Dong, Meibing Jin, Liu Yu, Changming Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Oceans · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsEkman transportDownwellingSalinityEkman layerGeologyOceanographySea surface temperatureClimatologyWind stressSea iceEnvironmental scienceUpwelling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Canada Basin (CB) is undergoing significant changes due to long‐term global climate change, and other shorter time‐scale processes that are still not well understood. Based on the in‐situ and satellite observations and atmospheric reanalysis data, interannual variabilities of sea surface salinity and Ekman pumping in the CB are investigated in the summertime of 2003–2017. This study reveals strong surface salinity reduction and Ekman downwelling enhancement during 2006–2012 compared with the remaining years. The surface 20‐m salinity averaged in 2006–2012 decreases by 1.26 PSU relative to the other years. The results suggest that the lower surface salinity is correlated to enhanced sea ice melt and Ekman convergence in the CB. Enhanced downward solar radiation accounts for the accelerated sea ice melt over the southeast CB, leading to the surface salinity decrease. Strengthened anticyclonic wind circulation over the CB not only enhances sea ice melt via strengthening offshore Ekman transport over the Chukchi Sea slope, but also favors freshwater accumulation in the CB through strengthening the horizontal convergence. The sea ice melt is estimated to account for 54% of the surface freshening, and the horizontal convergence is believed to play an important role in the remaining 46%. During the freshening years in the CB, the Ekman downwelling enhancement is mainly attributed to variations of wind stress curl, sea ice concentration, and ice‐ocean stress curl, and their relative contributions are estimated on the basis of on a linearized model as 72%, 12%, and 10%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research OceansSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207