MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3208943640 · doi:10.22323/1.396.0552

CP-violating Dashen phase transition in the two-flavor Schwinger model: a study with matrix product states

2022· article· en· W3208943640 on OpenAlexafffund
Stefan Kühn, Lena Funcke, Karl Jansen

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of The 38th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2021) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum many-body systems
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersNuclear PhysicsOffice of ScienceMinistry of Colleges and UniversitiesInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueResearch and Innovation FoundationIndustry CanadaNational Science FoundationGovernment of CanadaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsFlavorQuantum entanglementPhase transitionHamiltonian (control theory)Statistical physicsQuantum mechanicsMathematicsQuantumChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We numerically study the Hamiltonian lattice formulation of the two-flavor Schwinger model using matrix product states. Keeping the mass of the first flavor at a fixed positive value, we tune the mass of the second flavor through a range of negative values, thus exploring a regime where conventional Monte Carlo methods suffer from the sign problem and may run into instabilities due to zero modes. Our results indicate a phase transition at the point where the absolute value of the second flavor mass approaches the first flavor mass. The phase transition is accompanied by the formation of a fermion condensate, a steep drop of the average electric field, and a peak in the bipartite entanglement entropy. Our data hints at a second order transition, which is the 1+1D analog of the CP-violating Dashen phase transition in QCD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of The 38th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory — PoS(LATTICE2021)Same topicQuantum many-body systemsFrench-language works237,207