MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209083599 · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.26978.45762

Measurements of a DC Gas Discharge

2021· dissertation· en· W3209083599 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Edward Dewit

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasma Diagnostics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMitacsNihon University
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To investigate properties of gas discharges and to evaluate the design and implementation of a Langmuir probe diagnostic, an array of several probes was designed and inserted into an intermediate pressure direct-current (DC) gas discharge. In particular, this work was motivated by: studying electron kinetics in gas discharge plasmas and measurement of the electron energy distribution function (EEDF). First, measurements of the discharge were performed including obtaining current-voltage (IV) characteristics and determining breakdown voltages for several gases. Images of discharges were recorded using a digital camera, and emission spectra were obtained using a visible light spectrometer. Then, Langmuir probe measurements were then taken of the potential distribution in the cathode region and IV characteristics were obtained to determine plasma properties. Electron density and temperature were determined both by a graphical method and by calculation of the EEDF from the second derivative of the IV characteristic. Probe measurements were taken at a vacuum pressure of 1Torr and an electrode separation of 5cm. The results from a single experiment are reported for which the discharge voltage was set to 276V and discharge current to 0.238mA. The plasma properties obtained graphically and by the EEDF calculation were compared and their interpretation discussed. The results of the graphical analysis method indicated a plasma density of 9e14m-3 and an electron temperature of 5.4eV. The results of the EEDF method indicated a plasma density of 1.17e14m-3 and an electron temperature of 11.0eV. The results were compared to simulations performed using the open-source Boltzmann equation solver called BOLSIG. The main input parameters were: average reduced field of 170Td, and degree of ionization of 1e-8. The output from the program indicated a mean energy of 7.65eV, which falls between the values obtained graphically and by the EEDF calculation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicPlasma Diagnostics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207