Clinical Follow up of Octogenarian Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization in the Last years At Centro M eacute dico de Caracas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Elderly or very old patients are often excluded from randomized studies and therefore are subject to individualized treatment according to their clinical status Octogenarians constitute a high risk age group due to the high complexity of coronary disease more frequently multi vessels and associated co morbidity In this sense we to carry out a descriptive clinical follow up study of patients ge years of age treated at our Hemodynamic Unit Cath Lab at Centro M eacute dico de Caracas in the last five years Since January to June Clinical events such as total mortality cardiovascular and non cardiovascular mortality angina new revascularization myocardial infarction and stroke were evaluated Clinical follow up was done through an interview with a treating physician contact the patient or family members directly clinical history review was made on the database of Cath Lab Sixty one patients were followed up forty one were male and twenty were female Total mortality was cardiovascular mortality was and non cardiovascular mortality was In hospital mortality was associated with severe cardiovascular complications such as cardiogenic shock and acute pulmonary edema An average follow up time was plusmn months The mean age at baseline was plusmn and the mean age at the time of completion was plusmn Of the patients remained cardiovascular asymptomatic There were no major renal complications at the follow up and there were no significant bleedings In conclusion in a selected sample of octogenarian patients a total mortality of with cardiovascular mortality of and non cardiovascular mortality of was observed In hospital mortality was and there were no patients with end stage renal disease ESRD required dialysis during the follow up period of plusmn months
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".