MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209160170 · doi:10.1177/17579759211038485

Romper el <i>statu quo</i> al promover políticas para la salud, el bienestar y la equidad: un preludio a la UIPES 2022

2021· article· es· W3209160170 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brittany Jock, Carole Clavier, Evelyne de Leeuw, Katherine L. Frohlich

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Health Promotion · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

FrenchResumen:La próxima reunión internacional de la familia mundial de la promoción de la salud se realizará en Montreal, en mayo del 2022. El tema central de esta 24ª Conferencia es "Promover políticas para la salud, el bienestar y la equidad". Los organizadores decidieron trascender la retórica de los "sospechosos de siempre" y plantear un programa que cuestione realmente los conceptos clave en que se basa la promoción de la salud. En esta contribución, miembros de los Comités científicos nacional de Canadá y mundial de la UIPES reflexionan sobre el estado de la situación actual y las posibilidades futuras. En tal sentido, proponen tres temas: (a) aprovechar las oportunidades que traen las perturbaciones y los puntos de inflexión de los desafíos de salud pandémicos, del cambio climático, de los cambios geopolíticos, del malestar social o de la promesa tecnológica; (b) liberarse de las perspectivas mundiales que favorecen únicamente las soluciones del mercado, las divisiones entre Norte y Sur, hacia las prácticas de la descolonización emancipadora y los sistemas de conocimiento; y (c) abrirse camino entre disciplinas, barreras, fronteras e identidades que están arraigadas en nuestras prácticas y entendimientos para la innovación.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.475
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Health PromotionSame topicGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207