MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209180954 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxab061.080

98 Parental perspective on changes in health care following integration to a complex care program

2021· article· en· W3209180954 on OpenAlexaff
Louis–Philippe Thibault, Maria Marano, Lydia Saad, Nathalie Gaucher, Karine Couture, Marie‐Joëlle Doré‐Bergeron, Caroline Chartrand, Sandra Frégeau, Claude Julie Bourque, Niina Kleiber

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThematic analysisEmergency departmentHealth careMedicineInclusion (mineral)Family medicineNursingPatient satisfactionQualitative researchPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Primary Subject area Complex Care Background Quantitative studies have found that integration into a complex care program (CCP) leads to decreased number of visits to the emergency department (ED) and hospitalization days for children with medical complexity (CMC). However, little is known about CMC families’ experiences regarding their healthcare resource utilization patterns following their child’s integration in the CCP. Objectives To analyze parental perspectives regarding changes in healthcare resources utilization following CCP admission. Design/Methods This study was conducted in our tertiary care pediatric university hospital, between December 2019 and January 2021 using individual semi-structured interviews. To assess the effect of CCP admission on healthcare resources utilization, only patients with at least 6 months of chronic disease before inclusion were eligible (32 families). The interview guide was co-constructed by our CCP team of nurses, doctors, social worker and parents of CMC. Participation rate was over one third (12/32) throughout, for which a satisfactory level of data saturation was obtained, as core themes specific to the research question were repeatedly identified. Verbatims were analyzed with NVivo. Descriptive thematic analysis was performed by coding themes emerging from the data. Results Sixteen parents from twelve families were interviewed (11 mothers, 5 fathers, including 4 couples). Most parents had experienced a decrease in ED visits with improvement in their perceived satisfaction regarding the provided healthcare services following CCP admission. Visits to the CCP pediatrician led to appreciated, continuous and tailored care. In comparison, the constant change of pediatricians in the ED and during hospitalization on the ward seemed to complicate their care experience. Also, the support from pivot nurses and social workers for daily health issues, drug prescription and paperwork was perceived as a relief. This directly favorably influenced care experience. Profound knowledge of patients’ health conditions and families’ personal challenges and strengths, led to personalized care and trust that greatly improved parents’ confidence in care and empowered families. Individualized advice by the CCP team leading to prompt treatment and preventive measures started early at home were identified by parents as the main driving forces leading to the observed decrease in ED visits. When hospitalized, confidence in the quality of care provided by parents at home with close follow-up by CCP were identified as the main driving forces leading to the quicker discharge. Conclusion Changes in health care utilization following admission to CCP was associated with an improved care experience. Parents identified individualized care and close follow-ups as key factors leading to decreased health care utilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207