MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209196459 · doi:10.1136/oem-2021-epi.293

P-368 Occupational Biological Limit derivation process and Biological Limit Values for several priority substances

2021· article· en· W3209196459 on OpenAlexaff
Nolwenn Noisel, Farida Lamkarkach, Claude Viau, Fatoumata Sissoko, Christophe Rousselle, Domnique Brunet

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiomonitoringThreshold limit valueOccupational exposureCadmiumDetection limitOccupational exposure limitPopulationEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental scienceToxicologyEnvironmental healthChemistryStatisticsMedicineMathematicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> Biomonitoring and atmospheric metrology are complementary approaches to assess occupational exposure to chemicals. The ANSES working group on biomarkers of exposure (WGBME) has developed an approach to derive Biological Limit Value (BLV) for occupational priority substances. <h3>Objectives</h3> The aim of this commuication is to present the approach as we as the derived BLV for the priotity substances. <h3>Methods</h3> Based on available data and using a decision tree, 4 types of BLV may be derived: a BLV based on a health effect for substances with threshold effects, a BLV based on an Occupational Exposure Limit (OEL), a BLV based on a cancer risk level (10–4, 10–5 or 10–6) or a theoretical value called ‘pragmatic BLV’. When knowledge on the relationship biomarker-health effects or biomarker-exposure is lacking, no BLV is derived. Whenever possible, a Biological Reference Value (BRV) based on the 95th percentile of a non-occupationally exposed population is also proposed. BRVs are not risk-based but are part of the preventer’s toolbox. <h3>Results</h3> Since 2011, 16 substances were assessed by the ANSES WGBME. Detailed information has been published in scientific reports which are publicly available on the ANSES website. Lead and Cadmium were the only chemicals for which BLVs based on relationship between health effect and biological levels were derived: lead BLV of 180 μg.L-1 based on neurological effects and urinary cadmium (5 μg.g-1 creatinine) and blood cadmium (4 μg.L-1) based on nephrotoxicity. BLVs (urinary concentrations) based on OELs were derived for cobalt (5 μg.g-1 creatinine), dichloromethane (0.2 mg.L-1) and styrene (40 μg.L-1). A pragmatic BLV based on OEL was calculated for chromium VI (2.5 μg.L-1). No BLV was based on cancer risk level. In addition, no BLVs but BRVs were proposed for substances such as acrylamide, beryllium, butadiene and some phtalates. <h3>Conclusion</h3> This expertise from the ANSES WGBME has led to derive several BLV to prevent health effects in workers or to control exposure to contaminants. BLV and BRV help occupational physician to unfold prevention program and surveillance in occupational settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoster presentationsSame topicHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingFrench-language works237,207