Outcomes among adult survivors of total cavopulmonary Fontan palliation for single ventricle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This tertiary centre study aims to identify factors associated with adverse outcomes in adult survivors with total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) Fontan palliation for single ventricle. METHODS: This retrospective review of medical records identified adult (≥18 years) survivors of TCPC Fontan palliation who were followed at a single tertiary centre between 1 January 2000 and 1 July 2019. Adverse outcomes were defined as arrhythmia, pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement, liver cirrhosis, protein losing enteropathy, hospitalisation for heart failure, thromboembolic complication and/or death. RESULTS: 160 adult TCPC patients met the inclusion criteria: 117 (73.1%) extracardiac and 43 (26.9%) lateral tunnel. The median (IQR) duration of follow-up since TCPC palliation was 17.5 (11.8-21.3) years. An adverse outcome occurred in 87 (54.4%) patients. Adverse outcome-free survival rates at 10, 20 and 25 years post TCPC were 89% (95% CI 82% to 93%), 60% (95% CI 50% to 69%) and 24% (95% CI 15% to 35%), respectively. On multivariate analysis, extracardiac Fontan (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.20 to 4.08, p=0.011) was observed to be an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes after adjusting for age, race, morphology of the systemic ventricle and history of fenestration. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-centre retrospective study of adult survivors of TCPC palliation, extracardiac Fontan was associated with an increased hazard for adverse outcomes. This finding could guide clinicians in developing risk modification strategies and management decisions to improve long-term outcomes in these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".