50 Poractant alfa versus bovine lipid extract surfactant for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants: A prospective comparative effectiveness cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Primary Subject area Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Background There is a paucity of comparative effectiveness data for bovine lipid extract surfactant (BLES) and poractant alfa (Curosurf). Objectives To compare duration of respiratory support and short-term outcomes in very preterm infants treated with bovine lipid extract surfactant and poractant alfa. Design/Methods We performed a prospective, multicentre, comparative effectiveness study. Thirteen Canadian level III neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) provided bovine lipid extract surfactant to infants born <32 weeks’ gestational age (GA) for a set period of time in the year 2019 (3 to 9 months), then changed to poractant alfa for the remainder of the year. The primary outcome was total duration of respiratory support (invasive and non-invasive). We utilized the Canadian Neonatal Network database for all study data. Results A total of 968 eligible infants (530 infants < 28 weeks’ GA and 438 infants 280-316weeks’ GA) were included, of which 494 received bovine lipid extract surfactant and 474 received poractant alfa. In unadjusted analysis, no difference was observed in total duration of any respiratory support (median 38 vs. 40.5 days). After adjusting for baseline characteristics and accounting for cluster effects, infants treated with poractant alfa spent a median of 4.16 fewer days on respiratory support (95% CI 0.05, 8.28 days). This reduction was observed in the subgroup of infants 280-316 weeks’ GA, but not in those < 28 weeks’ GA, and was explained by their shorter time on non-invasive respiratory support. No differences were observed in the need to re-dose surfactant, hospital mortality, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or length of stay in NICU. Conclusion Administration of poractant alfa was associated with shorter median duration of respiratory support compared to bovine lipid extract surfactant in preterm neonates < 32 weeks’ GA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".