Caminhos possíveis no processo tradutório do conto “He had dreamed of returning” (“Ele sonhara em voltar”), de Pauline Kaldas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente artigo tem como objetivo apresentar os caminhos percorridos pelos tradutores durante o processo tradutório do conto “He had dreamed of returning” (“Ele sonhara em voltar”), de autoria da escritora árabe-estadunidense Pauline Kaldas. Buscou-se apontar como o contexto cultural é relevante para as tomadas de decisão durante o processo, assim como as escolhas fazem parte de um exercício também de natureza criativa. Foram escolhidos oito trechos para análise, nos quais destacamos os trechos que foram mais desafiadores e que demandaram mais pesquisas e reflexões, entre eles algumas escolhas tanto lexicais quanto de expressões idiomáticas mais familiares ao leitor lusófono. Vale ressaltar que os tradutores estavam constantemente atentos para a fluidez do texto, como também para a manutenção da estética do texto de origem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".