Optimizing Alignment of Speech and Language Latent Spaces for End-To-End Speech Recognition and Understanding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The advances in attention-based encoder-decoder (AED) networks have brought great progress to end-to-end (E2E) automatic speech recognition (ASR). One way to further improve the performance of AED-based E2E ASR is to introduce an extra text encoder for leveraging extensive text data and thus capture more context-aware linguistic information. However, this approach brings a mismatch problem between the speech encoder and the text encoder due to the different units used for modeling. In this paper, we propose an embedding aligner and modality switch training to better align the speech and text latent spaces. The embedding aligner is a shared linear projection between text encoder and speech encoder trained by masked language modeling (MLM) loss and connectionist temporal classification (CTC), respectively. The modality switch training randomly swaps speech and text embeddings based on the forced alignment result to learn a joint representation space. Experimental results show that our proposed approach achieves a relative 14% to 19% word error rate (WER) reduction on Librispeech ASR task. We further verify its effectiveness on spoken language understanding (SLU), i.e., an absolute 2.5% to 2.8% F1 score improvement on SNIPS slot filling task.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".