MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209441270 · doi:10.14740/jnr.v11i5.698

Simultaneous Encephalitis and Neuroretinitis After COVID-19 in a Young Adult: A Case Report

2021· article· en· W3209441270 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Maryam Poursadeghfard, Maryam Sharifian, Alijan Nemati, Ashkan Mowla

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFluid-attenuated inversion recoveryNauseaEncephalitisPediatricsBlurred visionRetinitisVomitingDiplopiaCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Magnetic resonance imagingOphthalmologyAnesthesiaPathologyDiseaseVirologyRadiologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Virus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic greatly impacted many aspects of life in the world. Both neurological and ophthalmologic presentations after COVID-19 have been reported. Herein, we present a case of both neuroretinitis and encephalitis after COVID-19 in a young adult. Both presentations are among the rare presentations of COVID-19. Similar manifestations were not reported previously. The 18-year-old previously healthy girl initially presented with low-grade fever, nausea, vomiting, body pain, and headache. The patient tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) by using a nasal swab. Two days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms, she reported blurred vision in both eyes, progressing to only light perception in 3 days. Based on the ophthalmological evaluation, she was diagnosed with neuroretinitis. A few days later, she gradually became drowsy, so she was referred for neurological evaluation. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed bilateral medial temporal T2 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyper-signal lesions suggestive of encephalitis. A low-dose steroid was started to treat the neuroretinitis. After about 2 weeks, significant improvement in visual acuity and resolution of retinitis patches were observed. Our case is rare in respect of both neurological and ophthalmic involvement. J Neurol Res. 2021;11(5):102-107 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr698

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology ResearchSame topicOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeFrench-language works237,207