MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S930 Safety of Ustekinumab Across Approved Adult Indications: Pooled Safety Analysis in Crohn’s Disease, Ulcerative Colitis, Psoriasis, and Psoriatic Arthritis Through up to 5 Years

2021· article· en· W3209727209 on OpenAlexaff
Millie D. Long, Silvio Danese, Elyssa Ott, Christopher Gasink, Miao Ye, Thomas Baker, Ilia Tikhonov, Proton Rahman, Bruce Strober, Edward V. Loftus

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Canadian institutionsSt. John’s Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUstekinumabPsoriatic arthritisUlcerative colitisPsoriasisInternal medicinePlaceboDermatologySurgeryDiseaseAdalimumabAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Ustekinumab (UST) is a well-established therapy and was approved for treatment of adults with psoriasis (PsO) in 2009, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in 2013, Crohn’s disease (CD) in 2016, and ulcerative colitis (UC) in 2019. An integrated analysis of safety data through 1 year1 and the more recently presented 2020 IBD Pooled Safety Dataset showed a favorable safety profile for UST across indications that was generally similar to placebo (PBO). Here, we present an integrated analysis of the pooled safety data incorporating phase 2/3 long-term safety data from IBD studies through up to 5 years in CD and 2 years in UC and psoriatic disease studies through up to 5 years in PsO and 1 year in PsA. Methods: Data from 13 phase 2/3 studies in approved indications were pooled. Concomitant immunomodulators and corticosteroids were permitted for IBD and PsA pts, but not PsO pts. All pts who received ≥1 dose of UST were included in this analysis. Safety outcomes are presented as events per 100 patient-years (PY) of follow-up and 95% confidence interval (CIs). Of note, the PBO-controlled period in most PsO studies was 12 wks, and 16 wks in PSA. Results: Across all indications, 2501 pts were treated with PBO with 1244 PYs of follow-up and 6710 pts were treated with UST with 13807 PYs of follow-up. Rates of key events per 100 PYs and corresponding 95% CIs were generally similar between UST and PBO groups (Table 1). In pooled indications in the PBO and UST groups, respectively, the most frequent adverse events (AEs; excluding preferred terms of CD and UC) were nasopharyngitis (20.83 vs 20.87), upper respiratory tract infection (13.51 vs 14.53), arthralgia (13.99 vs 7.01), abdominal pain (10.77 vs 4.01), and diarrhea (6.67 vs 3.88). Anal abscess (PBO 0.72 vs UST 0.17), pneumonia (PBO 0.32 vs UST 0.14), and cellulitis (PBO 0.16 vs UST 0.11) were the most frequently reported serious infections. Events of malignancy and death were less frequently reported, particularly in the PBO group and as such, CIs were wide. Conclusion: The safety profile of UST across pooled indications was favorable through up to 5 yrs, confirming the well-established safety profile of UST in psoriatic and IBD indications.Table 1.: Key Safety Events in CD, UC, PsO, and PsA Studies Through Up to 5 Years

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicBiosimilars and Bioanalytical MethodsFrench-language works237,207