MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3209736664 · doi:10.1016/j.jmsacl.2021.10.005

Continuous reference intervals for pediatric testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin and free testosterone using quantile regression

2021· article· en· W3209736664 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel T. Holmes, J. Grace van der Gugten, Benjamin Jung, Christopher R. McCudden

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationCanadian Electricity AssociationUniversity of OttawaSt. Paul's HospitalOttawa HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSex hormone-binding globulinTestosterone (patch)StatisticsParametric statisticsGlobulinMathematicsEndocrinologyBiologyHormoneAndrogenInternal medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Testosterone (T), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), free testosterone (FT) and bioavailable testosterone (BAT) are commonly employed tests in pediatric endocrinology and all require age-dependent reference intervals for interpretation. The common methods used to derive these reference intervals require decisions about data shape and/or age partition thresholds, which can result in sharp differences between age groups, particularly for pubescent children. Partitioning also results in a form of data loss, where data from one age-bin is completed disconnected from the adjacent age-bins. Non-parametric continuous reference intervals methods have previously been developed to avoid some of these drawbacks. These strategies use all the available data and smooth transitions between ages avoiding partitioning. However, the fitting process involves selection and adjustment of many parameters and it can be difficult to maintain a reproducible approach. Here we provide a workflow for non-parametric continuous reference intervals applied to T, FT, BAT, and SHBG using the R language quantregGrowth package. T measurements were determined by LC-MS/MS, FT and BAT were calculated, and SHBG was measured on the Roche Cobas e601. The continuous interval methodology is described in detail with code examples and illustrations for reproducibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical LabSame topicHormonal and reproductive studiesFrench-language works237,207