MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210028200

Congenital absence of inferior vena cava in a 33-year-old with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome: a case report

2020· article· en· W3210028200 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jesse Spooner, Manjot Birk, Nadra Ginting

Bibliographic record

VenueUBC Faculty of Medicine medical journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular anomalies and interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDeep veinInferior vena cavaThrombosisAntiphospholipid syndromeCoagulation DisorderSurgeryAgenesisPediatricsInternal medicineCoagulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Background: Agenesis of the inferior vena cava (AIVC) is a rare disorder that, when combined with co-morbid hypercoagulable disease such as anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome (APAS), increases the risk of chronic deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We report a 33-year-old female with a past medical history of recurrent DVTs and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APAS) who at the age of 33, was incidentally found to have AIVC while assessing clot burden, which likely contributed to her recurrent DVT episodes earlier in life. Management:  The combination of AIVC and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome is rare and can lead to recurrent DVTs in young patients. Prolonged anti-coagulation is the preferred treatment in addition to elastic compression stockings, modification of risk factors and treatment of further complications. In this paper we provide a case discussion and up to date information on diagnosis and management of a patient with both AIVC and APAS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUBC Faculty of Medicine medical journalSame topicVascular anomalies and interventionsFrench-language works237,207