MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3210064312 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxab061.000

4 Educational Impact of Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography (TNE) on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine (NPM) Subspecialty Residents

2021· article· en· W3210064312 on OpenAlexaffabout
Isabel Friedmann, Patrick J. McNamara, Soume Bhattacharya, Anita Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspecialtyMedicineCurriculumHemodynamicsPediatricsFamily medicineInternal medicinePsychologyPedagogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Primary Subject area Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Background Targeted Neonatal Echocardiography (TNE) is a real-time cardiac imaging modality used by neonatologists who have completed a minimum of one-year training in cardiovascular physiology and imaging methodology, to optimize management of neonatal cardiorespiratory compromise. TNE is provided as a clinical service, to aid in diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of neonatal cardiovascular illness. Potential impacts of TNE on trainee education are unknown. Objectives This study aimed to describe trainees’ perspectives on existing neonatal hemodynamics education and perceived impacts of TNE on their education. Design/Methods This was a mixed quantitative and qualitative study that surveyed NPM subspecialty residents in Canada and the United States of America (USA), at centres both with and without TNE. Survey questions sought to explore current perspectives on cardiac and hemodynamics curriculum in training programs. Results 92 residents responded to the survey, of whom 24 (26%) were enrolled in a program with an active TNE service, 64 (70%) were training at a non-TNE centre, and 4 (4%) were unsure. Trainees at TNE centres were more satisfied with their overall hemodynamics training (91% vs. 69%, p=0.040; Table 1). 25% of all trainees felt they do not have sufficient hemodynamics training to prepare them for independent practice. On analysis of curriculum content, cardiac development, myocardial functioning in prematurity, and cardiac mechanics emerged as areas of knowledge gaps among all residents (Table 2). TNE centre trainees reported that bedside TNE teaching offers immediate insights into how patients respond to management decisions, while didactic TNE teaching allows for learning at a slower pace, with appropriate knowledge consolidation. Only 9% of respondents at TNE sites reported a formal process of hemodynamics review between clinical and TNE teams. 90% of respondents believed that a TNE service would positively impact their hemodynamics education by improvement in knowledge of cardiovascular physiology and management decisions. Conclusion Most trainees believed that TNE may be a valuable educational tool, with current perceived satisfaction with overall hemodynamics training higher among residents training at TNE centres. 25% of all trainees felt unprepared for transitioning to independent practice. Hence, thoughtful curriculum design for real-time and consolidation learning, with specific emphasis on content gaps, as well as working toward a formal process of hemodynamics review, should be considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→