Deconstructing scale-free neuronal avalanches: behavioral transitions and neuronal response
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Observations of neurons in a resting brain and neurons in cultures often display spontaneous scale-free (SF) collective dynamics in the form of information cascades, also called ‘neuronal avalanches’. This has motivated the so called critical brain hypothesis which posits that the brain is self-tuned to a critical point or regime, separating exponentially-growing dynamics from quiescent states, to achieve optimality. Yet, how such optimality of information transmission is related to behavior and whether it persists under behavioral transitions has remained a fundamental knowledge gap. Here, we aim to tackle this challenge by studying behavioral transitions in mice using two-photon calcium imaging of the retrosplenial cortex (RSC)—an area of the brain well positioned to integrate sensory, mnemonic, and cognitive information by virtue of its strong connectivity with the hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, and primary sensory cortices. Our work shows that the response of the underlying neural population to behavioral transitions can vary significantly between different sub-populations such that one needs to take the structural and functional network properties of these sub-populations into account to understand the properties at the total population level. Specifically, we show that the RSC contains at least one sub-population capable of switching between two different SF regimes, indicating an intricate relationship between behavior and the optimality of neuronal response at the subgroup level. This asks for a potential reinterpretation of the emergence of self-organized criticality in neuronal systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".