MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3210276922 · doi:10.1681/asn.20213210s159a

Kidney Injury Molecule 1 Is a Receptor for SARS-CoV-2 in Lung and Kidney

2021· article· en· W3210276922 on OpenAlexaff
Takaharu Ichimura, Philipp Aschauer, Robert F. Padera, Astrid Weins, Gregory A. Dekaban, Jimmy D. Dikeakos, Mahmoud L. Nasr, Joseph V. Bonventre

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKidneyLungAcute kidney injuryKidney diseaseAntibodyA549 cellBiologyHEK 293 cellsVirologyReceptorMedicineMolecular biologyPathologyImmunologyInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 was first reported in Wuhan in 2019 and reached pandemic proportions. SARS-CoV-2-related respiratory failure and acute kidney injury (AKI) are major complications of infection. Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1) is a scavenger receptor expressed by kidney epithelial cells and was previously reported to be a receptor for Hepatitis virus A. We hypothesized that KIM-1 is a receptor for SARS-CoV-2 and may play an important role in COVID-19 lung and kidney injury. Methods: Human lung and kidney autopsy samples were immunostained and analyzed. Liposomal nanoparticles displaying the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein on their surface (virosomes) were generated. Virosome uptake by A549 lung epithelial cells, mouse primary lung epithelial cells and human kidney tubuloids (3D structures of kidney epithelial cells) was evaluated in the presences or absence of anti-KIM-1 antibody or TW-37, a small molecule inhibitor of KIM-1-mediated endocytosis that we discovered. Protein-protein interaction characteristics between purified SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and purified KIM-1 were determined using microscale thermophoresis. HEK293 cells expressing human KIM-1 but not angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) were infected with live SARS-CoV-2 or pseudovirions expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Results: KIM-1 was expressed in lung and kidney epithelial cells in COVID-19 patient autopsy samples. Human and mouse lung and kidney epithelial cells expressed KIM-1 and endocytosed spike-virosomes. Both anti-KIM-1 antibodies and TW-37 inhibited uptake. Enhanced KIM-1 expression by human kidney tubuloids increased virosome uptake. KIM-1 positive cells expressed less ACE2. Using microscale thermophoresis, the EC50 for interaction between KIM-1 and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and the receptor binding domain were 56.2±28.8 nM and 9.95±3.10 nM, respectively. KIM-1-expressing HEK293 cells without ACE2 expression had increased susceptibility to infection by live SARS-CoV-2 and pseudovirions expressing spike when compared with control cells. Conclusions: KIM-1 is a receptor for SARS-CoV-2 in the lung and kidney and thus, KIM-1 inhibitors such as TW-37 can be potential therapeutics and/or prophylactic agents for COVID-19. Funding: NIDDK Support, Other NIH Support - NCATS, Government Support - Non-U.S.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies→French-language works237,207→