MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210308867 · doi:10.1073/pnas.2109364118

The minor pilin PilV provides a conserved adhesion site throughout the antigenically variable meningococcal type IV pilus

2021· article· en· W3210308867 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean‐Philippe Barnier, Julie Meyer, Subramania Kolappan, Haniaa Bouzinba-Ségard, Gaël Gesbert, Anne Jamet, Eric Frapy, Sophia Schönherr-Hellec, Elena Capel, Zoé Virion, Marion Dupuis, Emmanuelle Bille, P. Morand, Taliah Schmitt, Sandrine Bourdoulous, Xavier Nassif, Lisa Craig, Mathieu Coureuil

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsPilinPilusNeisseria meningitidisMicrobiologyFimbriae ProteinsBiologyNeisseriaAdhesionBacteriaChemistryGeneticsVirulenceGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Type IV pili (T4P) are among the most widespread adhesive factors in prokaryotes. In pathogenic Neisseria , the major pilin, which provides the structural framework for the filamentous T4P, undergoes antigenic variation allowing the bacteria to evade the humoral immune response without impacting host-cell adhesion. Here, we show that a minor pilin, PilV, is distributed throughout the pilus and contributes to Neisseria meningitidis adhesion and that antibodies to PilV block meningococcal adhesion in vivo. Our results provide a mechanism whereby N. meningitidis varies its immunodominant major pilin to escape antibody recognition while maintaining conserved sites throughout the pilus for host receptor binding. They further suggest a strategy to prevent or block deadly N. meningitidis infections by targeting this minor pilin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicBacterial Infections and VaccinesFrench-language works237,207