A Case of Chronic Wernicke Encephalopathy (WE): An Underdiagnosed Phenomena
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wernicke encephalopathy (WE) is the most common neurological complication of thiamine deficiency in patients who have a background of chronic alcohol use disorder. WE is characterized by acute onset of confusion, gait ataxia, and oculomotor dysfunction. Prompt treatment with parenteral thiamine leads to improvement. Untreated WE has mortality rates of up to 20% and many cases progress to the more chronic Korsakoff syndrome. Cases of untreated WE in which symptoms last beyond the acute phase and become chronic are rarely found in the literature. Here, we present a case of a 64-year-old female having a background of chronic alcohol use disorder presenting with symptoms of gait ataxia, recurrent falls, and decreased concentration. These symptoms had progressed over a period of nine months. The patient was seen by her family physician and several specialists undergoing many diagnostic studies with inconclusive results. Ultimately, with a high index of suspicion for thiamine deficiency, she was admitted for IV thiamine treatment. Upon follow-up in the clinic, the patient reported improvement in her balance and concentration further confirming the initial suspicion of WE with thiamine deficiency as the cause of her symptoms. This case corroborates the existence of WE as a chronic phenomenon in addition to the more commonly reported acute WE. Furthermore, this case highlights the importance of recognizing WE as a potential cause of chronic neurological symptoms in people with alcohol-related disorders and the role of IV thiamine in treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".