MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210414758 · doi:10.1364/josab.430789

Nested nonconcentric microring resonators with high-Q and large fabrication tolerance

2021· article· en· W3210414758 on OpenAlexaff
Raktim Haldar, S. Ummethala, Rajat Kumar Sinha, Shailendra K. Varshney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Optical Society of America B · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
KeywordsResonatorFabricationMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microring resonators are one of the most sought-after optical components for realizing several on-chip functionalities that include sensing, data routing, new frequency generation, and quantum photonic applications. Many of these applications demand a high quality factor and large notch depth (high extinction ratio), which can be achieved by critical coupling. However, the critical coupling is very sensitive to fabrication accuracies and thermal drift. Geometrical parameters of the resonators are generally swept to attain critical coupling, where a few designs can pass the critical coupling condition criteria. In this work, we propose a methodology to circumvent this vital issue. The proposed technique is based on coupled-resonator systems where two different microrings are embedded into a larger microring, referred to as a nonconcentric nested microring resonator (NN-MRR). The NN-MRR configuration relaxes the requirement of the critical coupling condition by 20% when the strip optical waveguide has either smooth or rough sidewalls. Numerical simulations reveal that, unlike standard MRR, a high Q -factor ( > 1 0 5 ) and a large transmission notch depth > 10 d B can be maintained irrespective of the rings’ coupling conditions for the nested MRRs. Besides the extra degree of freedom of design provided by the inner rings, the other significant advantage of the proposed NN-MRR is its compactness. We believe that the nested MRR arrangement could be highly efficient for biosensing, nonlinear, and quantum applications within a broad ambient temperature range. We have fabricated the NN-MRRs in a silicon-on-insulator platform through electron beam lithography and experimentally demonstrated the theoretical and numerical findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Optical Society of America BSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207