Le droit constitutionnel comme vecteur de transformation sociale. Le cas de la conjugalité au Canada (Constitutional Law as a Vector of Social Change. The Case of Conjugality in Canada)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
French Abstract: Dans les societes occidentales hypermodernes, c’est-a-dire caracterisees par une modernite radicale et exacerbee, la transformation des codes sociaux et la perte d’autorite de nombreuses institutions ayant traditionnellement regule le champ de la morale ont modifie les representations de la conjugalite. Le droit tantot a pris acte de ces changements, tantot les a impulses. C’est precisement le type de role qu’a joue le droit constitutionnel canadien depuis son enchâssement, a partir de 1982, du principe du constitutionnalisme comme pierre d’assise de l’ordre juridique canadien. Dans cette foulee, la nature et les consequences du lien conjugal ont ete redefinies au nom de droits a l’egalite eriges au rang de droits fondamentaux justiciables devant les tribunaux de droit commun dans le cadre d’un processus de controle concret et a posteriori de la constitutionnalite des lois. Nous brosserons dans ce texte un tableau de ce processus de redefinition, qui demeure encore inacheve et qui souleve d’importantes questions ayant trait a l’economie des rapports entre les pouvoirs judiciaires et legislatifs. Nous le ferons d’abord en evoquant certaines evolutions de la conjugalite – etape incontournable afin de demontrer l’insuffisance de la conception juridique traditionnelle de la conjugalite face aux evolutions de ce phenomene et, partant, l’impulsion sociale a modifier cette conception4 – (chapitre I), puis, revenant au Canada, en precisant les parametres de l’interpretation donnee aux droits a l’egalite (chapitre II). Nous verrons ensuite comment ces droits ont influe sur la reconnaissance d’une pluralite de formes de conjugalite (chapitre III). L’on constatera, au final, que le droit constitutionnel a indeniablement participe a l’elargissement du concept juridique de conjugalite au Canada. English Abstract: This article examines the processes under which the nature and consequences of conjugality have been redefined, and pluralized, in the name of equality rights in Canada. These processes have raised important questions pertaining to the relationship between judicial and legislative powers, and have revealed both a disconnect between traditional conceptions of conjugality and contemporary social practices, and the importance of law, and constitutional law in particular as a vector of social change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.038 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".