Bibliographic record
Abstract
Post colonialism deals with the cultural heritage of colonialism and imperialism which mainly exposes the exploitation of colonized people and their lands and brings out the upshots of the unfair treatment under the control of the colonisers. The post colonial theory analyses the culture, history, literature and discourse. The postmodern novelists deal with a variety of themes by blending history, fancy and reality. The unexplored world of the a subaltern is presented realistically by writers like Mahasweta Devi, Bama, Aravind Adiga and Rohinton Mistry. Internationally acknowledged Post Colonial writer, Rohinton Mistry is an Indian born Canadian. His writings deal with the downtrodden exploitation by the political injustices, economic imbalances and societal stereotypes. Though he belongs to a Parsi community, he focuses mainly on the plight of the untouchables who are treated inhumanely by the dominant class in this novel, A Fine Balance (1995). The novel deals with several issues like the quest for identity, conflict between the oppressed and the oppressor, political injustices, economic imbalances and loneliness. The most striking and prominent theme is exploitation of the lower caste people by the upper caste. The aim of this paper is to bring out the subaltern consciousness in Rohinton Mistry’s A Fine Balance and thereby make the society to realise, empathise and live in harmony with one another.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".