A Survey on Change Detection and Time Series Analysis with Applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the advent of the digital computer, time series analysis has gained wide attention and is being applied to many fields of science. This paper reviews many traditional and recent techniques for time series analysis and change detection, including spectral and wavelet analyses with their advantages and weaknesses. First, Fourier and least-squares-based spectral analysis methods and spectral leakage attenuation methods are reviewed. Second, several time-frequency decomposition methods are described in detail. Third, several change or breakpoints detection methods are briefly reviewed. Finally, some of the applications of the methods in various fields, such as geodesy, geophysics, remote sensing, astronomy, hydrology, finance, and medicine, are listed in a table. The main focus of this paper is reviewing the most recent methods for analyzing non-stationary time series that may not be sampled at equally spaced time intervals without the need for any interpolation prior to the analysis. Understanding the methods presented herein is worthwhile to further develop and apply them for unraveling our universe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it