Loss of epigenetic regulation disrupts lineage integrity, reactivates multipotency and promotes breast cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Systematically investigating the scores of genes mutated in cancer and discerning real drivers from inconsequential bystanders is a prerequisite for Precision Medicine, but remains challenging. Here, we developed a somatic CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis screen to study 215 recurrent ‘long-tail’ breast cancer genes, which revealed epigenetic regulation as major tumor suppressive mechanism. We report that core or accessory components of the COMPASS histone methylase complex including KMT2C , KDM6A , BAP1 and ASXL2 (“EpiDrivers”) cooperate with PIK3CA H1047R to transform mouse and human breast epithelial cells. Mechanistically, we find that Cre-mediated activation of PIK3CA H1047R elicited an aberrant alveolar lactation program in luminal cells, which was exacerbated upon loss of EpiDrivers. Remarkably, EpiDriver loss in basal cells also triggered an alveolar-like lineage conversion and accelerated formation of luminal-like tumors, suggesting a basal origin for luminal tumors. As EpiDrivers are mutated in 39% of human breast cancers, lineage infidelity and lactation mimicry may significantly contribute to early steps of breast cancer progression. Statement of significance Infrequently mutated genes comprise most of the mutational burden in breast tumors but are poorly understood. In-vivo CRISPR screening identified functional tumor suppressors that converged on epigenetic regulation. Loss of epigenetic regulators accelerated tumorigenesis and revealed lineage infidelity and aberrant expression of lactation genes as potential early events in tumorigenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".