Cognitive Function and the Relationship With Health Literacy and Secondary Prevention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome at Early Discharge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment (CI) may contribute to difficulties in understanding and implementing secondary prevention behavior change after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but the association is poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence of CI in patients 4 weeks post ACS and the association with health literacy and secondary prevention. METHODS: Patients with ACS who were free from visual deficits, auditory impairment, and dementia diagnoses were recruited and assessed 4 weeks post discharge for cognitive function (Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test), health literacy (Newest Vital Sign), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire), physical activity (Fitbit Activity Tracker and Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly), and medication knowledge and adherence. RESULTS: Participants (n = 45) had an average age of 65 ± 11 years, 82% were male, 64% were married/partnered, and 82% had high school education or higher. Overall CI was identified in 28.9% (n = 13/45) of the patients 4 weeks after discharge, which was composed of patients detected on both the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (n = 3), patients detected on Montreal Cognitive Assessment alone (n = 6), and patients detected on Hopkins Verbal Learning Test alone (n = 4). Fewer patients with CI had adequate health literacy (61.4%) than patients with normal cognition (90.3%, P = .024). Significant correlations were found between Hopkins Verbal Learning Test scores and medication knowledge (0.4, P = .008) and adherence (0.33, P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory study, 30% of patients with ACS demonstrated CI at 4 weeks post discharge. Two screening instruments were required to identify all cases. Cognitive impairment was significantly associated with health literacy and worth further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".