MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210684518 · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntab229

The Effect of Nicotine Dependence on the Risk of Developing Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: Results From the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions

2021· article· en· W3210684518 on OpenAlexaff
Christine Ibrahim, Bernard Le Foll, Ahmed N. Hassan

Bibliographic record

VenueNicotine & Tobacco Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdds ratioMedicinePropensity score matchingMediationConfidence intervalPsychiatryNicotineTraumatic stressClinical psychologySmoking cessationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: It is evident that an association between smoking and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) exists, but research is lacking in establishing the directionality of the relationship. AIMS AND METHODS: We used longitudinal data from waves I (2001-2002) and II (2004-2005) of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Individuals with nicotine dependence (ND) were matched to individuals without ND using propensity score matching to estimate the risk of developing PTSD after trauma. We also matched smokers (with or without ND) to lifetime nonsmokers to estimate their risk of developing PTSD after trauma. Lastly, we conducted a mediation analysis on the effect of ND severity on PTSD symptoms. RESULTS: Individuals with ND (n = 1514) were more likely to develop PTSD (odds ratio: 1.59; 95% confidence interval: 1.09-2.32; p = .017) compared with individuals without ND (n = 6047). Smokers (regardless of ND status) (n = 2335) compared with nonsmokers (n = 5226) had no significant effect on risk of PTSD (p = .26). Withdrawal was found to be a mediator of the effect of ND severity on PTSD symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: ND, but not smoking status, increases a smoker's risk of developing PTSD. This provides information that could aid in preventive strategies for individuals with ND who are exposed to trauma. IMPLICATIONS: This study provides evidence in a national representative sample of adults in the United States that ND may increase one's risk of developing PTSD after exposure to trauma. It also shows the directionality of the association between smoking and PTSD. Lastly, it demonstrates that withdrawal may be the link to the association between ND and PTSD. We hope that with these findings, preventative strategies are put in place for smokers who are dependent and are exposed to trauma, such that they do not develop PTSD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNicotine & Tobacco ResearchSame topicPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207