Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia on subjective and objective measures of sleep and cognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Study Objectives To assess the effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for insomnia (CBTi) on subjective and objective sleep, sleep-state misperception as well as self-reported and objective cognitive performance. Methods We performed a randomized controlled trial with a treatment group and a wait-list control group to assess changes in insomnia symptoms after CBTi (8 sessions/3 months) in 62 participants with chronic insomnia. To this end, we conducted a multimodal investigation of sleep and cognition including subjective measures of sleep difficulties (Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), sleep diaries) and cognitive functioning (Sahlgrenska Academy Self-reported Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire), objective assessments of sleep (polysomnography recording, cognition (attention and working memory tasks), and sleep-state misperception measures, collected at baseline and at 3-months post-randomization. At 6 months post-randomization, we collected similar data from the wait-list group after CBTi. We also assessed ISI one year after CBTi in both groups. Our main analysis investigated changes in sleep and cognition after 3 months (treatment versus wait-list group). In secondary analyses, we pooled data from both groups to observe changes after CBTi. Results ISI score was reduced and self-reported sleep quality improved after CBTi (treatment group at 3 months and pooled groups after CBTi). Sleep misperception in sleep onset latency and sleep duration decreased after CBTi. In contrast, objective sleep, objective and subjective cognitive functioning did not improve after CBTi. Conclusions We showed that CBTi has a beneficial effect on variables pertaining to the subjective perception of sleep, which is a central feature of insomnia. However, we observed no significant effect of CBTi on measures of cognitive functioning. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Nighttime sleep difficulties and daytime cognitive impairment are the two main complaints of individuals suffering from insomnia. We investigated the effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for insomnia (CBTi) on these two aspects of chronic insomnia, using both self-reported and objective measures, as well as sleep-state misperception (i.e., the discrepancy between self-reported and objective sleep). We showed significant changes after CBTi in insomnia severity, subjective sleep quality and perception of sleep, while no consistent benefit emerged for objective measures of sleep and assessments of cognitive functioning. CBTi thus appears to primarily benefit subjective sleep quality as well as the alignment between subjective and objective estimates of sleep.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".