Comparative phylogeography study reveals introgression and incomplete lineage sorting during rapid diversification of <i>Rhodiola</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Many plant taxa in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP) and the Hengduan Mountains (HM) radiated rapidly during the Quaternary but with frequent secondary contact between diverging populations. Incomplete lineage sorting and introgressive hybridization might be involved during the rapid radiation, but their effects on phylogeography have not been fully determined. METHODS: We investigated the chloroplast DNA (cpDNA)/internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence variations of 611 samples of Rhodiola bupleuroides, R. discolor, R. fastigiata and R. chrysanthemifolia from the QTP and HM to compare the phylogeographic patterns between the four species with different evolutionary histories, geographic ranges and reproductive modes. KEY RESULTS: The divergence times of these species were consistent with the last peak of in situ speciation in the HM. While closely related species exhibited different phylogeographic patterns, they shared several ribotypes and haplotypes in sympatric populations, suggesting introgressive hybridization. A significant phylogenetic discordance between ribotypes and haplotypes was detected in three species, implying incomplete lineage sorting. Rhodiola discolor houses an extraordinary richness of cpDNA haplotypes, and this finding may be attributed to adaptive radiation. CONCLUSION: In addition to geographic isolation and climate oscillations during the Quaternary, both introgressive hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting play important roles in species that experienced rapid diversification in the QTP and HM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".