MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210827308

Examinations of the Labour Market Outcomes and Housing of Ontario Social Assistance Recipients

2020· dissertation· en· W3210827308 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. G. L. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLabour economicsSocial assistanceBusinessPublic housingEconomicsEconomic growth
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis showcases a series of research examining various aspects of social assistance programs and their recipients using a set of administrative microdata following beneficiaries of the social assistance programs in Ontario, Canada. In Chapter 2, an analysis is carried out examining the disparities between various labour market outcomes for immigrant and non-immigrant social assistance recipients. After controlling for education level and other characteristics, survival analysis shows that likelihood of immigrant recipients exiting social assistance in any given period is statistically significantly lower than that of non-immigrant recipients by around 16%. However, further analysis reveals that immigrant recipients are less likely than non-immigrant recipients to return to social assistance after leaving. This discrepancy between the likelihood of finding employment and the implicit likelihood of retaining employment may be evidence of discrimination faced by immigrants in the Ontario labour market. Within the immigrant portion of the sample, higher age at their time of arrival to Canada leads to lower likelihood of finding employment, but lower likelihood of returning to social assistance, which could point to issues of cultural assimilation or discrimination against immigrants in the hiring process, or the undervaluation of human capital attained outside of Canada. Chapter 3 focuses on active labour market programs to which Ontario Works social assistance beneficiaries are assigned, intended to help them find and keep employment. After controlling for endogenous enrollment and omitted variable bias using an instrumental variable approach, significant differential impacts are found on unemployment spell duration, return rates to social assistance, and future time spent on social assistance across programs. Additionally, the effects of programs when assigned simultaneously are found to be detrimental. Chapter 4 provides a descriptive analysis of the housing situations and levels of residential mobility among recipients of Ontario Works, as well as the Ontario Disability Support Program. Additionally, an examination of those experiencing homelessness while on social assistance is carried out to examine prevalence of homelessness among different subpopulations. Overall, this research aims to shed light on both the living situations and labour market experiences facing those who are the most economically vulnerable in our society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207