Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maple was conceived over forty years ago as a general purpose system for mathematical calculations. Its strength, however, has always been its community. The work of hundreds of researchers from around the world has produced a mathematical engine unique in its depth, breath and efficiency. Forward thinking educators have used Maple to transform the way mathematics is taught, all the way supporting each other with advice, examples and myriads of Maple worksheets. Scientists and engineers have been taking advantage of the power and ease of use of the Maple system to help them in their discovery and the development of new products. Together we have tackled environmental issues, taken on disease and reached for the stars.
 
 At Maplesoft, we are firm believers that Math Matters and our mission is to provide technology to explore, derive, capture, solve and disseminate mathematical problems and their applications, and to make math easier to learn, understand, and use. This mission, we share with hundreds of thousands of Maple users from all over the world and indeed we rely on that community’s constant stream of feedback and support.
 
 With Maple Transactions, our community is gaining a new place to come together. A place to exchange ideas, share experiences and discoveries. A place to welcome newcomers and discuss possibilities. The drive, vision and energy of editor in chief Prof Rob Corless together with the fantastic editorial board that he assembled, have given me a glimpse into a bright future for the journal and this first issue bears witness to the high quality of contributions we can expect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it