MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3210903854 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxab061.029

38 Clinical features and echocardiographic parameters of relative adrenal insufficiency (RAI) among preterm infants: A five-year review

2021· review· en· W3210903854 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gurpreet Grewal, Joseph Ting, C.W. Lam, Krishan Yadav, Mimi Kuan

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdrenal insufficiencyGestational agePediatricsNeonatal intensive care unitBirth weightShock (circulatory)Intensive carePregnancyInternal medicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Primary Subject area Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine Background Infants born at low gestational age (GA) often present with a septic shock-like picture in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Some of these premature infants are noticed to exhibit inadequate cortisol levels at such a time of stress, an entity termed ‘relative adrenal insufficiency’ (RAI), which is postulated to compromise the compensatory mechanisms and further circulatory collapse. Objectives To review the clinical features and echocardiographic parameters of RAI in preterm infants, and their correlation with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation tests in a quaternary NICU over 5 years. Design/Methods This is a single centre retrospective study. Infants born at < 32 weeks GA between January 2015 to June 2019, admitted to the British Columbia Women’s Hospital NICU (Vancouver, British Columbia), were reviewed. Infants who presented with a shock-like picture with a cortisol level at this time of stress of < 250 nmol/L were included. Infants who have received corticosteroid prior to cortisol collection were excluded. Results There were 798 infants < 32 weeks admitted to the BCWH NICU over a 5 year period, of which 284 had a spot cortisol drawn. We identified 45 eligible infants in our study (5.6% of NICU admissions). Their median (IQR) for GA, birth weight, cortisol level, and age of onset of RAI were 25 weeks (24, 26), 690 g (590, 815), 83 (58, 127), and 13 days of life (8, 24), respectively. Among these infants, 73% developed significant hypotension or respiratory failure (Table 1). 13 infants (28.9%) had echocardiogram performed at the time of cardiopulmonary deterioration, and all had normal left ventricular (LV) fractioning shortening (median [IQR]: 42% [38-49%]) and LV output (median [IQR]: 242 mL/kg/min [155-330 mL/kg/min]). Only 19 infants (42.2%) received hydrocortisone, with a median [range] treatment duration of 2 days [1–8]. Lower cortisol level was associated with lower GA at the presentation of RAI (p=0.049), but not predictive of adverse clinical and laboratory outcomes (Table 2). ACTH stimulation tests were performed in 20 (44.5%) infants and 3 (15%) were found to be abnormal, and results were not correlated with clinical features. Conclusion In our cohort, we identified 5% of NICU admission with RAI, based on the cut-off of cortisol < 250 nmol/L at the time of shock-like presentation. Lower cortisol level was associated with lower GA at the presentation of RAI. Further prospective study with a well-defined protocol is needed to understand the use of cortisol and its clinical implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→