Seasonal consumption of terrestrial prey by a threatened stream fish is influenced by riparian vegetation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The consumption of terrestrial prey by fishes highlights the functional value of terrestrial habitats, but such consumption is not well documented for many small-bodied species. We determined the diet and consumption of terrestrial prey by a threatened fish, silver shiner Notropis photogenis , using stomach content and stable isotope analyses to better understand the functional role of riparian habitat for the species. Results indicate silver shiner is a generalist drift feeder that consumes a wide range of aquatic and terrestrial prey. Both stomach content and stable isotope analyses indicated that terrestrial prey was commonly exploited and that terrestrial prey consumption was both seasonally and spatially variable. Based on stomach contents, the contribution of terrestrial prey was (average ± SD) 41.53 ± 32.35% in fall and 20.45 ± 20.45% in summer; based on stable isotopes it was 35.24 ± 4.41% in fall and 39.88 ± 12.34% in summer. During fall, when bankside terrestrial invertebrates were more abundant, silver shiner stomachs contained significantly more terrestrial prey in reaches where riparian vegetation cover was highest, indicating that intact riparian cover may facilitate access to high-quality prey. The consumption of terrestrial prey may be particularly important in fall, as it may promote increased growth and survival leading to more successful overwintering. Our findings suggest that terrestrial subsidies are ecologically valuable for silver shiner and that the protection of reaches with intact riparian habitats would likely improve conservation and recovery efforts by helping ensure access to key prey resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".