MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3210967421 · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.121.034580

Associations of Early Systolic Blood Pressure Control and Outcome After Thrombolysis-Eligible Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results From the ENCHANTED Study

2021· article· en· W3210967421 on OpenAlexafffund
Xia Wang, Jatinder S. Minhas, Tom J. Moullaali, Gian Luca Di Tanna, Richard I. Lindley, Xiaoying Chen, Hisatomi Arima, Guofang Chen, Candice Delcourt, Philip M. Bath, Joseph P. Broderick, Andrew M. Demchuk, Geoffrey A. Donnan, Alice C. Durham, Pablo M. Lavados, Tsong‐Hai Lee, Christopher Levi, Sheila Cristina Ouriques Martins, Verónica V. Olavarría, Jeyaraj Pandian, Mark Parsons, Octávio Marques Pontes‐Neto, Stefano Ricci, Shoichiro Sato, Vijay K. Sharma, Federico Silva, Trung Quoc Nguyen, Ji‐Guang Wang, Mark Woodward, John Chalmers, Lili Song, Craig S. Anderson, Thompson Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research CentreSchool of Public Health, Imperial College LondonCumming School of Medicine, University of CalgaryPeking UniversityIngham Institute for Applied Medical ResearchNational University of SingaporeChang Gung Medical FoundationChang Gung UniversityHunter Medical Research InstituteImperial College LondonFukuoka UniversityUniversity of LeicesterSydney Partnership for Health, Education, Research and EnterpriseMacquarie UniversityUniversidade de São PauloNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular CenterGeorge Institute for Global HealthNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchUniversity of Cincinnati
KeywordsMedicineThrombolysisModified Rankin ScaleInternal medicineStroke (engine)Blood pressureCardiologyOdds ratioIntracerebral hemorrhageIschemic strokeIschemiaSubarachnoid hemorrhageMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Purpose: In thrombolysis-eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke, there is uncertainty over the most appropriate systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering profile that provides an optimal balance of potential benefit (functional recovery) and harm (intracranial hemorrhage). We aimed to determine relationships of SBP parameters and outcomes in thrombolyzed acute ischemic stroke patients. Methods: Post hoc analyzes of the ENCHANTED (Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study), a partial-factorial trial of thrombolysis-eligible and treated acute ischemic stroke patients with high SBP (150–180 mm Hg) assigned to low-dose (0.6 mg/kg) or standard-dose (0.9 mg/kg) alteplase and intensive (target SBP, 130–140 mm Hg) or guideline-recommended (target SBP <180 mm Hg) treatment. All patients were followed up for functional status and serious adverse events to 90 days. Logistic regression models were used to analyze 3 SBP summary measures postrandomization: attained (mean), variability (SD) in 1–24 hours, and magnitude of reduction in 1 hour. The primary outcome was a favorable shift on the modified Rankin Scale. The key safety outcome was any intracranial hemorrhage. Results: Among 4511 included participants (mean age 67 years, 38% female, 65% Asian) lower attained SBP and smaller SBP variability were associated with favorable shift on the modified Rankin Scale (per 10 mm Hg increase: odds ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.71–0.82]; P <0.001 and 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76–0.98]; P =0.025) respectively, but not for magnitude of SBP reduction (0.98, [0.93–1.04]; P =0.564). Odds of intracranial hemorrhage was associated with higher attained SBP and greater SBP variability (1.18 [1.06–1.31]; P =0.002 and 1.34 [1.11–1.62]; P =0.002) but not with magnitude of SBP reduction (1.05 [0.98–1.14]; P =0.184). Conclusions: Attaining early and consistent low levels in SBP <140 mm Hg, even as low as 110 to 120 mm Hg, over 24 hours is associated with better outcomes in thrombolyzed acute ischemic stroke patients. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01422616.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStrokeSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207