Feeding Experiences of HIV-Exposed Preterm Infants Among Mothers Living with HIV in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Providing adequate nutrition to preterm infants who are born to HIV-positive mothers is more challenging due to the mother's underlying health and nutrition status. The understanding of these issues and active participation of the mothers have a significant role in giving continuous care for HIV-exposed preterm infant. Hence, this study aimed to explore the experience of HIV-positive mothers' feeding practice of their preterm infants, and health workers to identify barriers and facilitators of feeding HIV-exposed preterm infants. METHODS: A phenomenological qualitative study design was conducted in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, between May 1, 2016 and March 31, 2017. Mothers who gave birth to HIV-exposed preterm infants at the study sites' follow-up clinic were traced and invited by the healthcare providers to voluntarily participate in this study. Fifteen in-depth interviews with mothers of HIV-exposed preterm infants and seven key informant interviews with health professionals and policymakers were carried out. The interviews were transcribed and translated and then manually analyzed thematically. RESULTS: The health education given during antenatal care (ANC) did not consider the feeding practice needs for HIV-exposed preterm infants. Child health status, desire to have a healthy infant, financial constraints and family support were among the influential factors in the feeding practice of HIV-exposed preterm infants mentioned by the study participants. HIV-exposed preterm infant feeding procedure neither has a guideline nor is clearly mentioned in the national HIV guidelines. CONCLUSION: The desire to have a healthy infant was a major facilitator for feeding of HIV-exposed premature infants. However, financial constraints majorly limited the option to be only exclusive breastfeeding. This became even more problematic for the mother if the premature infant became ill and could not breastfeed well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".