MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211010292 · doi:10.5206/tba.v1i1.7936

“Apt Invention” in the Anthropocene: Hyperobjects, Marek Hłasko, and Zero K

2020· article· en· W3211010292 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniel Uncapher

Bibliographic record

Venuetba Journal of Art Media and Visual Culture · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnthropoceneHistoryThe HolocaustDystopiaEnvironmental ethicsAestheticsArt historyLiteraturePhilosophyArtPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anthropogenic climate change defines the contemporary global experience. Like finance and fascism in the ‘30s, world war and holocaust in the ‘40s, and cold war in the ‘50s, the sixth mass extinction event has emerged as the looming issue, the dominating Real, to which all other realisms are secondary. But unlike war and economic collapse, Anthropogenic climate change poses challenges that are generally mistreated, or avoided entirely. As Timothy Clark writes in Ecocriticism on the Edge, “the largely benumbed recognition of this reality has become one feature of life in the so-called Anthropocene, to use the currently still informal term for the epoch at which largely unplanned human impacts on the planet’s basic ecological systems have passed a dangerous, if imponderable, threshold.” (Clark x) The Anthropocene “evades normal categories of attention,” and is thus “frightening and intellectually liberating.” In the ‘50s and ‘60s the novelist Marek Hłasko, the so-called “Eastern European James Dean,” (Ufberg) developed a technique he called “apt invention” to write about his own existential threat of postwar totalitarianism. In his autobiography Beautiful Twentysomethings Hłasko wrote that the straight truth was incomprehensible to people, and only by surpassing the facts with “apt invention” could a writer render the reality of life in Soviet-occupied Poland on the page. In other words, “apt invention” is the act of mediated imagination that makes the gesture of realism possible, an idea at large today in the popularity of speculative fiction, weird fiction, slipstream, and other modes of genre-lucid literature. Don DeLillo’s Zero K (2016), capitalizing off a popular tolerance for speculation in realism, employs various modes of 21st-century “apt invention” to explore death in an age of extinction, a genre-like surpassing of reality to communicate the Lacanian Real, the experience outside of representation, if experience is to be communicable at all.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.026
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuetba Journal of Art Media and Visual CultureSame topicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionFrench-language works237,207