MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211026994 · doi:10.11159/ijmmme.2021.003

Improving the Solar Carbothermal Reduction of Magnesia as a Production Process of Metal Fuels

2021· article· en· W3211026994 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Youssef Berro, J.R. Puig, Marianne Balat‐Pichelin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mining Materials and Metallurgical Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Nationale de la RechercheEquipex
KeywordsCarbothermic reactionMaterials scienceBentoniteChemical engineeringWaste managementPolyvinyl alcoholPelletsMetallurgyComposite materialCarbide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent studies focused on the carbothermal reduction of magnesia as a possible production process of metallic Mg powders that can be used as transportation fuels due to their high energetic value, absence of greenhouse gas emissions, and the ability to regenerate them (through reduction/combustion cycles). Herein, we investigated the development of the reduction process, under vacuum, in the Sol@rmet reactor using concentrated solar energy and charcoal reducing agent as sustainable sources. We shown that the reduction is improved by controlling various parameters as the argon flow, the heating rate, the retention time, the type of the collector filter, and the binder used to form the C/MgO pellets. In fact, a circulating swirl flow inside the reactor allows to prevent the condensation of the produced Mg inside the reactor and to purge out the produced CO, thus reducing its partial pressure and accelerating the reaction. Moreover, using a metallic filter has improved the collection of produced Mg powders. Finally, we found that polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and bentonite binders have a catalytic effect on the reaction with the best Mg yield of around 96%, with 96% Mg purity, reached when the temperature is raised progressively over 22 min and using 5% starch + 5% bentonite binders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Mining Materials and Metallurgical EngineeringSame topicChemical Looping and Thermochemical ProcessesFrench-language works237,207