Early Eukaryotes in the Lakhanda Biota (Mesoproterozoic, Southeastern Siberia)—Morphological and Geochemical Evidence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Mesoproterozoic Lakhanda Group (~1030 Ma) preserves one of the most diverse communities of pre-Ediacaran eukaryotes. More precisely, the Lakhanda Biota includes more than twenty taxa that have been assigned to eukaryotes with different degrees of confidence. Eight of these taxa meet current criteria for the identification of eukaryotic fossils in ancient records. These include previously described fossils such as ornamented acritarchs (Valeria lophostriata, Trachyhystrichosphaera aimika), filamentous coenocytic organisms (Aimonema ramosa, Palaeovaucheria clavata), as well as fossils with smooth-walled envelopes and single outgrowth structures (Caudosphaera expansa, Germinosphaera bispinosa, and Jacutianema solubila). In addition to these, we found as yet undescribed fossils which share remarkable similarities with Ourasphaira giraldae, a possible higher fungi species known from the (?) Meso- to Neoproterozoic of Arctic Canada. Regardless of the exact systematic affinity, these fossils can confidently be assigned to eukaryotes because of the size and high morphological complexity. Intriguingly, the organic record of the Lakhanda Formation lacks biomarkers indicative of eukaryotes (that is, regular steranes). This finding would be in line with the idea that eukaryotes were present but not significant in Mesoproterozoic marine ecosystems. However, preliminary data from an ongoing study indicate an advanced thermal maturity of the organic matter, emphasizing that this conclusion might not be drawn with absolute confidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".