MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3211099861 · doi:10.1136/oem-2021-epi.68

O-352 Evaluating program effectiveness on return-to-work after work-related injury in the construction sector

2021· article· en· W3211099861 on OpenAlexaffabout
Robert Macpherson, Ailin He, Mieke Koehoorn, Benjamin C. Amick, Chris McLeod

Bibliographic record

VenueOral Presentations · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPercentileRehabilitationMedicineDuration (music)Intervention (counseling)Work (physics)Quantile regressionPhysical therapyVocational rehabilitationOccupational safety and healthNursingStatisticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> Return-to-work (RTW) in the construction sector is more challenging than in many other sectors. Between 2010 and 2011, the Ontario Workplace Safety Insurable Board (WSIB) introduced the Work Reintegration (WR) program in an attempt to improve RTW outcomes for injured workers. <h3>Objective</h3> To determine whether the WR program was associated with reducing work disability duration in the Ontario construction sector. <h3>Methods</h3> WSIB claims data were extracted for construction workers compensated for time off work following work-related injuries betwen the years 2009 and 2015 (n=27,131). Claims receiving referrals to return-to-work (RTW) and vocational rehabilitation (VR) specialists were propensity score matched with claims receiving no referrals. Multivariable quantile regression models were used to examine differences in the cumulative disability days paid during two-years post-injury between the groups of claims before and fater the WR intervention period and the differences in these differences. <h3>Results</h3> Prior to the WR program, cumulative disability days paid was greatest among claims referred to VR specialists, followed by claims referred to RTW specialists (390 and 109 additional days than claims with no referrals, respectively). Following the WR program intervention, cumulative disability days paid reduced for all claims but most notably among longer duration claims referred to RTW specialists (reduction of 274 days at the 90th percentile in the disability distribution) and shorter duration claims referred to VR specialists (reductions of 255 and 214 days at the 25th and 50th percentiles in the disability distribution, respectively). <h3>Conclusion</h3> The WR program intervention was effective in reducing the cumulative disability days paid for construction worker claims targeted under the various referrals. While the effects varied at different percentiles in the disability distribution, and by specialist referral, future research should examine the type and timing of services received to more fully understand what may be driving the overall findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.543
Teacher spread0.417 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOral PresentationsSame topicOccupational Health and Safety ResearchFrench-language works237,207