MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3211178359 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxab061.071

89 The Unintended Consequences and Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients, Families and Clinicians in a Children’s Hospital

2021· article· en· W3211178359 on OpenAlexaffabout
Catherine Diskin, Julia Orkin, Blossom Dharmaraj, Tanvi Agarwal, Arpita Parmar, Jeremy Friedman

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicThematic analysisUnintended consequencesCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Health careMedicineNarrativeFamily medicineQualitative researchTheme (computing)NursingPsychologyDiseasePolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Primary Subject area Hospital Paediatrics Background The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has broad implications for children and families. Healthcare experience and delivery has changed significantly, and changes will likely continue for some time. Particular attention has been paid to delays in accessing timely pediatric care leading to unintended morbidity. Objectives This study aimed (1) to describe the broader spectrum of unintended negative consequences by describing the courses of care altered by the COVID-19 pandemic from the clinician's perspectives and (2) to identify thematic similarities to inform clinical practice change. Design/Methods All full-time doctors, dentists, and nurse practitioners working at a tertiary care children’s hospital in Canada were surveyed every two weeks throughout the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. We asked them to identify and describe clinical cases in which they perceived a negative outcome associated with hospital or societal changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Analysis followed a qualitative case series methodology using a narrative synthesis approach to determine similarities and associated themes. Results Two-hundred and twelve clinicians reported 116 cases. Several broad themes emerged, including (1) timeliness of care, (2) disruption of child and family-centred care, (3) new pressures in the provision of safe and efficient care and (4) inequity in the experience of the COVID-19 pandemic. Within each of these themes, subthemes emerged, highlighting its impact on (1) patients, (2) their families and (3) healthcare providers. Table 1 provides examples of cases within each theme. Conclusion The broad consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic impact patients, families, healthcare providers and the healthcare system. Understanding this breadth is necessary as we strive to deliver safe, high quality, family-centred pediatric care in this new era. As the pandemic continues, we need to consider carefully how to provide elective and ambulatory care, including surgery, in this era of social distancing. Particular attention is needed to understand particular aspects, including vulnerable children and the clinician experience of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts→French-language works237,207→