О ВРЕМЕНИ ПРЕКРАЩЕНИЯ ЖИЗНИ НА ПОЗДНЕСКИФСКИХ ПОСЕЛЕНИЯХ СЕВЕРО-ЗАПАДНОГО КРЫМА
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Статья посвящена синхронизации и датировке финальных комплексов восьми позднескифских поселений, расположенных в Северо-Западном Крыму и исследованных раскопками. Массовый материал позволяет разделить их по времени гибели на две группы. Первая прекращает существование в первой четверти I в. н. э., скорее всего, между 16 и 23 гг. (Кульчук, Чайка, Керкинитида). Жизнь второй группы поселений заканчивается в конце I – начале II в. н. э. (Калос Лимен, Тарпанчи, Беляус, Южно-Донузлавское, Кара-Тобе). The paper is devoted to synchronization and dating of the final assemblages from eight Late Scythian settlements excavated in the northwestern Crimea. Based on mass finds, these settlements can be divided into two groups regarding the time when they were abandoned. The first group of settlements ceased to exist in the first quarter of the I century AD, most likely, between AD 16 and AD 23 (Kulchuk, Chayka, Kerkinitida). The settlements from the second group functioned till the end of the I – early II centuries AD (Kalos Limen, Tarpanchi, Belyaus, Yuzhno-Donuzlavskoye, Kara-Tobe).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".